The visual analogue scale (VAS) and ordered categorical scales, i.e. numeri
c rating scales (NRS), are commonly used in the assessment of pain. However
, these scales are bounded by fixed endpoints and thus the range of measure
ment is limited. The disparity in repeated assessments of perceived pain in
tensity with the VAS, NRS, and electrical stimulation applied as a matching
stimulus was studied in 69 patients (48 women and 21 men, 19-72 years) wit
h chronic nociceptive or neurogenic pain. Responsiveness with transcutaneou
s electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) using the same measurement procedures
was evaluated in the same patients. Comparison of results from the three p
ain assessments showed that the painmatcher is at least as reliable and res
ponsive as VAS and NRS. None of the three measurements showed evidence for
systematic disagreement and had only significant random individual disagree
ment. They also showed evidence for responsiveness.