R. Triolo et al., Effects of stimulated hip extension moment and position on upper-limb support forces during FNS-induced standing - A technical note, J REHAB RES, 38(5), 2001, pp. 545-555
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Rehabilitation,"Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine
Journal title
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
This study explores the effects of active hip extension moment produced by
electrical stimulation on the support forces the arms must exert through an
assistive device during quiet erect standing with functional neuromuscular
stimulation (FNS) in individuals with spinal cord injuries (SCI). A static
sagittal plane biomechanical model of human standing was developed to pred
ict the effects of stimulated hip extension moment and sagittal plane hip a
ngle on the arm support necessary to maintain an upright posture. Two indiv
iduals with complete thoracic SCI were then tested while they stood with co
ntinuous stimulation to the knee and trunk extensors. The steady-state acti
ve extension moment exerted at the hip was varied by activating different c
ombinations of hip extensor muscles with continuous stimulation while stead
y-state support forces applied to the arms and feet during standing were me
asured. The steady-state support forces imposed on the arms during quiet st
anding decrease with increased stimulated hip extension moment and are high
ly dependent upon hip flexion angle, as predicted by the biomechanical simu
lations. Experimentally, the combination of gluteus maximus and semimembran
osus stimulation produced three times more steady-state hip extension momen
t than did stimulation of the gluteus maximus and adductor magnus. This res
ulted in a ten-fold decrease in body weight supported on the arms. More ver
tical postures (smaller hip flexion angles) improve the effectiveness of th
e hip extensor muscles in reducing the support forces placed on the arms. A
single Newton-meter of stimulated hip extension moment with the hips fixed
at 5 degrees of flexion results in almost five times the reduction in arm
support forces as with the hips at 20 degrees. To minimize the forces appli
ed by the arms on an assistive device for support while standing with FNS,
these preliminary results suggest that (1) efforts should be made to assume
the most erect postures possible and (2) muscles and stimulation paradigms
that maxiize active hip extension moment should be chosen.