Tracking the ecological soundness of farming systems: Instruments and indicators

Citation
C. Lightfoot et R. Noble, Tracking the ecological soundness of farming systems: Instruments and indicators, J SUST AGR, 19(1), 2001, pp. 9-29
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture/Agronomy
Journal title
JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE
ISSN journal
10440046 → ACNP
Volume
19
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
9 - 29
Database
ISI
SICI code
1044-0046(2001)19:1<9:TTESOF>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
Many farming practices degrade agroecosystems. High-external-input or moder n farming tends to degrade by pollution whereas traditional, low-input syst ems generally tend to degrade by erosion. Smallholders in Sub-Saharan Afric a, the focus of this paper, are forced to degrade their natural resource ba se just to keep pace with growing populations. Out of fourteen cases from S enegal, Nigeria, Gambia, Tanzania, Zimbabwe and Kenya only one, from Upper Machakos in Kenya, managed to restore soil fertility. Not surprisingly then , topics concerning environment and agroecosystem health find themselves ge tting much more attention now than ten years ago. Of particular interest ar e methods to evaluate and monitor changes in the ecological health or sound ness of a farming system. While a number of methods exist most are too comp lex for farmers to understand and operate by themselves. Not only do most m ethods require 'experts' to run them, they also take too much of the partic ipating farmers' time. Many of these monitoring and evaluation methods also assume a level of knowledge concerning ecologically sound farming that far mers, and many of those who advise them, often do not have. In most cases, both farmers and researchers must learn what changes to the farming system are needed to make them more ecologically sound. This paper discusses possi ble methodologies and presents a proposal on how to design a multistakehold er learning process for agricultural development. Methods are discussed for measuring the direct environmental impact of new farming approaches and th e stakeholder partnerships that influence the outcome. Examples of possible indicators are provided for this evaluation process. Farmers can use these methods and indicators to guide the transformation of their farming system s towards a more ecologically sound future. Examples of such transformation s using this approach are taken from studies of smallholder farmers in Ghan a and Malawi. Two conclusions are drawn. One conclusion is that ecological soundness can bring economic growth and secondly, learning requires special social processes and institutional structures to be effective.