S. Hayes, Breaking down the barriers: The Schoharie County Local Agri-Preneurship Project for next generation farmers, J SUST AGR, 19(1), 2001, pp. 85-108
The Schoharie County Local Agri-Preneurship Project for Next Generation Far
mers (hereafter, the SCHOCO-LOCA project) was initiated to determine the op
portunities and harriers facing that locale's new agriculturists. Using dat
a collected from a series of focus groups including area high school studen
ts, farmers, and agricultural, financial, educational and human service pro
fessionals, the study identifies a set of barriers named by the acronym TAG
S (Technical problems, Assumptions, Community concerns and Social issues) t
hat is threatening the health and future of Schoharie County's agricultural
industry.
After examining the changing structure of U.S. agriculture and the concomit
ant impact on Schoharie County, the study explains the problems that collec
tively create the barrier of TACS. Technical problems included a lack of cu
stom services, lack of knowledge about farm transfers, an unfulfilled deman
d for information about alternative agriculture, and a need for improved bu
siness management skills. Observed assumptions included feelings that the s
tate's land grant school was not concerned with the county's agricultural f
uture, impressions that new farmers were destined for a life of poverty, an
d that new agricultural businesses were necessarily part of a conventional,
input-intensive agricultural paradigm. Community concerns expressed by foc
us groups included a lack of cooperation and communication between differen
t agencies, an impression within the education system that agricultural cou
rses arc generally meant for students who are incapable of handling traditi
onal classroom instruction, a community-wide perception that the local stat
e agricultural college is not a respected post-secondary education institut
ion, conflicts among the agricultural and non-agricultural community member
s, and confusion among the agricultural service industry regarding who is a
farmer deserving of support services, and who is not. Social issues facing
the farmers included relationship strife amongst themselves, an independen
t mindset that prevents farmers from seeking assistance, isolation, apathy
and depression, and a need to organize the agricultural sector for politica
l purposes. Recommendations include suggestions for helping farmers work to
gether, capitalizing on new agricultural trends for diversification and nic
he marketing, and acknowledging the importance of local agriculture on a co
mmunity-wide basis. While this study addresses the specific concerns of one
rural community, practitioners in the yield of sustainable agriculture dev
elopment may find some of the concepts insightful as they reflect on their
own situations and experiences.