S. Itoh et al., Formation, characterization, and reactivity of bis(mu-oxo)dinickel(III) complexes supported by a series of bis[2-(2-pyridyl)ethyl]amine ligands, J AM CHEM S, 123(45), 2001, pp. 11168-11178
Bis(mu -oxo)dinickel(III) complexes supported by a series of bis[2-(2-pyrid
yl)ethyl]amine ligands have been successfully generated by treating the cor
responding bis(mu -hydroxo)dinickel(II) complexes or bis(mu -methoxo)dinick
el(II) complex with an equimolar amount of H2O2 in acetone at low temperatu
re. The bis(mu -oxo)dinickel(III) complexes exhibit a characteristic UV-vis
absorption band at similar to 410 nm and a resonance Raman band at 600-610
cm(-1) that shifted to 570-580 cm-1 upon O-18-substitution. Kinetic studie
s and isotope labeling experiments using O-18(2) imply the existence of int
ermediate(s) such as peroxo dinickel(II) in the course of formation of the
bis(mu -oxo)dinickel(III) complex. The bis(mu -oxo)dinickel(III) complexes
supported by the mononucleating ligands (L1(x) = para-substituted N,N-bis[2
-(2-pyridyl)ethyl]-2-phenylethylamine; X = OMe, Me. H, Cl) gradually decomp
ose, leading to benzylic hydroxylation of the ligand side arm (phenethyl gr
oup). The kinetics of the ligand hydroxylation process including kinetic de
uterium isotope effects (KIE), p-substituent effects (Hammett plot), and ac
tivation parameters (DeltaH(H)(double dagger) and DeltaS(H)(double dagger))
indicate that the bis(mu -oxo)dinickel(III) complex exhibits an ability of
hydrogen atom abstraction from the substrate moiety as in the case of the
bis(mu -oxo)dicopper(III) complex. Such a reactivity of bis(mu -oxo)dinicke
l(III) complexes has also been suggested by the observed reactivity toward
external substrates such as phenol derivatives and 1,4-cyclohexadiene. The
thermal stability of the bis(mu -oxo)dinickel(III) complex is significantly
enhanced when the dinucleating ligand with a longer alkyl strap is adopted
instead of the mononucleating ligand. In the m-xylyl ligand system, no aro
matic ligand hydroxylation occurred, showing a sharp contrast with the reac
tivity of the (mu-eta (2):eta (2)-peroxo)dicopper(II) complex with the same
ligand which induces aromatic ligand hydroxylation via an electrophilic ar
omatic substitution mechanism. Differences in the structure and reactivity
of the active oxygen complexes between the nickel and the copper systems ar
e discussed on the basis of the detailed comparison of these two systems wi
th the same ligand.