Can tumor size be a guide for limited surgical intervention in patients with peripheral non-small cell lung cancer? Assessment from the point of viewof nodal micrometastasis
Y. Ohta et al., Can tumor size be a guide for limited surgical intervention in patients with peripheral non-small cell lung cancer? Assessment from the point of viewof nodal micrometastasis, J THOR SURG, 122(5), 2001, pp. 900-906
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Objective: We sought to determine the critical diameter of a peripheral non
-small cell lung cancer tumor less than which no evidence of nodal micromet
astasis is present.
Methods: Samples of 3081 lymph nodes from 181 patients with stage I periphe
ral lung cancer (155 with adenocarcinoma and 26 with squamous cell carcinom
a) who had undergone complete resection with systematic lymphadenectomy wer
e used in the study. In the samples immunohistochemical staining for cytoke
ratin was performed. The expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (
VEGF) at primary sites was also immunohistochemically assessed.
Results: Nodal micrometastasis was detected in 44 patients. The mean tumor
sizes were 2.2 +/- 1.3 cm (range, 1.0-7.0 cm) in nodal micrometastasis-posi
tive adenocarcinoma, 2.1 +/- 0.9 cm (range, 0.5-6.0 cm) in nodal micrometas
tasis-negative adenocarcinoma, 4.8 +/- 2.3 cm (range, 2.2-10.0 cm) in nodal
micrometastasis-positive squamous cell carcinoma, and 3.2 +/- 2.1 cm (rang
e, 0-9.0 cm) in nodal micrometastasis-negative squamous cell carcinoma. The
tumor size in the nodal micrometastasis-positive group tended to be greate
r than that in the nodal micrometastasis-negative group in squamous cell ca
rcinomas, but there was no significant difference in adenocarcinomas. Nodal
micrometastasis was not found in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of
2.0 cm or less in diameter. However, nodal micrometastasis was found in 20%
(19/95) of the patients with adenocarcinoma of 1.1 to 2.0 cm in diameter a
nd even in 4 of 11 patients with adenocarcinoma of 1.0 cm or less. Among th
e patients with nodal micrometastasis, survival of patients with vascular e
ndothelial growth factor overexpression was worse than that of patients wit
hout it. The survival of patients with nodal micrometastasis without vascul
ar endothelial growth factor overexpression was comparable with that of pat
ients without nodal micrometastasis.
Conclusion: A limited surgical intervention without lymphadenectomy is vali
dated for squamous cell carcinoma of 2.0 cm or less without pleural involve
ment. In adenocarcinoma the tumor size itself is not a reliable guide for n
odal micrometastasis status. In patients with nodal micrometastasis with va
scular endothelial growth factor overexpression, the risk of systemic disea
se should be considered.