Thrombin-specific anticoagulation with bivalirudin versus heparin in patients receiving fibrinolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: the HERO-2 randomised trial
Hd. White et al., Thrombin-specific anticoagulation with bivalirudin versus heparin in patients receiving fibrinolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: the HERO-2 randomised trial, LANCET, 358(9296), 2001, pp. 1855-1863
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Background The combination of fibrinolytic therapy and heparin for acute my
ocardial infarction fails to achieve reperfusion in 40-70% of patients, and
early reocclusion occurs in a substantial number. We did a randomised, ope
n-label trial to compare the thrombin-specific anticoagulant, bivalirudin,
with heparin in patients undergoing fibrinolysis with streptokinase for acu
te myocardial infarction.
Methods 17 073 patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction were
randomly assigned an intravenous bolus and 48-h infusion of either bivaliru
din (n=8516) or heparin (n=8557), together with a standard 1.5 million unit
dose of streptokinase given directly after the antithrombotic bolus. The p
rimary endpoint was 30-day mortality. Secondary endpoints included reinfarc
tion within 96 h and bleeding. Strokes and reinfarctions were adjudicated b
y independent committees who were unaware of treatment allocation. Analysis
was by intention to treat.
Findings By 30 days, 919 patients (10.8%) in the bivalirudin group and 931
(10.9%) in the heparin group had died (odds ratio 0.99 [95% CI 0.90-1.09],
p=0.85). The mortality rates adjusted for baseline risk factors were 10.5%
for bivalirudin and 10.9% for heparin (0.96 [0.86-1.07], p=0.46). There wer
e significantly fewer reinfarctions within 96 h in the bivalirudin group th
an in the heparin group (0.70 [0.56-0.87], p=0.001). Severe bleeding occurr
ed in 58 patients (0.7%) in the bivalirudin group versus 40 patients (0.5%)
in the heparin group (p=0.07), and intracerebral bleeding occurred fn 47 (
0.6%) versus 32 (0.4%), respectively (p=0.09). The rates of moderate and mi
ld bleeding were significantly higher in the bivalirudin group than the hep
arin group (1.32 [1.00-1.74], p=0.05; and 1.47 [1.34-1.62], p<0.0001; respe
ctively. Transfusions were given to 118 patients (1.4%) in the bivalirudin
group versus 95 patients (1.1%) in the heparin group (1.25 [0.95-1.64], p=0
.11).
Interpretation Bivalirudin did not reduce mortality compared with unfractio
nated heparin, but did reduce the rate of adjudicated reinfarction within 9
6 h by 30%. Small absolute increases were seen in mild and moderate bleedin
g fn patients given bivalirudin. Bivalirudin is a new anticoagulant treatme
nt option in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with strepto
kinase.