Options for assessing PPO quality: Accreditation and profiling as accountability strategies

Citation
Dp. Scanlon et al., Options for assessing PPO quality: Accreditation and profiling as accountability strategies, MED C RES R, 58, 2001, pp. 70-100
Citations number
43
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science
Journal title
MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW
ISSN journal
10775587 → ACNP
Volume
58
Year of publication
2001
Supplement
1
Pages
70 - 100
Database
ISI
SICI code
1077-5587(2001)58:<70:OFAPQA>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
This article examines and discusses various alternatives for measuring the quality of care and services provided by preferred provider organizations ( PPOs). The topic is approached from both a conceptual and a practical persp ective, outlining key assumptions that underlie the desire to measure the q uality of PPOs, while considering the current limitations and difficulties associated with existing PPO arrangements. Although the article does not pr ovide normative judgments about which approach is best, it attempts to high light the advantages and disadvantages of possible approaches in an unbiase d manner. Significant attention is given to accreditation and profiling as possible methods for assessing the quality of care in PPOs.