The rise and demise of national development and the origins of post-Cold War capitalism

Authors
Citation
Mt. Berger, The rise and demise of national development and the origins of post-Cold War capitalism, MILLENN-J I, 30(2), 2001, pp. 211
Citations number
118
Categorie Soggetti
Politucal Science & public Administration
Journal title
MILLENNIUM-JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES
ISSN journal
03058298 → ACNP
Volume
30
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Database
ISI
SICI code
0305-8298(2001)30:2<211:TRADON>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
This article begins by outlining the way in which the crisis of colonialism , the universalisation of the nation-state system, and the deepening of the Cold War, provided the context for the rise and consolidation between the 1940s and the 1970s, of the national development project, which naturalised the nation-state as the key unit of both capitalist and socialist developm ent worldwide. This leads to an examination of postcolonial and post-develo pment critiques and a discussion of the implications of the onset of global isation for the project of national development. It is concluded that the n otion of post-Cold War capitalism (in contrast to the idea of the postcolon ial condition) more effectively captures the global and the specific aspect s of the present historical juncture and the challenges that confront every effort to articulate alternatives to the globalisation project. The immedi ate origins of post-Cold War capitalism are traced to a number of interconn ected trends in the 1970s. In particular, the modification of the overall s hape of the political economy of the Cold War by the US paved the way for t he elaboration and eventual consolidation of the US-centred globalisation p roject. Yet as the global market unfolds the instrumentalities and capaciti es of states are reconfigured and diluted. Although the new era of post-Col d War capitalism continues to be characterised by an open political horizon , where movements like the Zappatistas can offer an alternative, there is s till a lack of serious systemic challenges (of either a reactionary, reform ist or a revolutionary character) to the prevailing global order.