In a response to Fred Dallmayr's 'conversation across boundaries', this art
icle focuses on the concentric character of most contemporary models of the
territorial state and global diversity. Endorsing Dallmayr's agenda, while
amending and augmenting it, the paper also explores a more rhizomatic or n
etwork vision of pluralism. The argument is that such an ideal is most cong
ruent with the conversation Dallmayr pursues.