Hd. Banta et Sb. Thacker, Historical controversy in health technology assessment: The case of electronic fetal monitoring, OB GYN SURV, 56(11), 2001, pp. 707-719
Electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) was introduced in the late 1950s as an al
ternative to traditional auscultation by stethoscope or fetoscope in the ma
nagement of labor and delivery. The new technology was seen as a valuable t
ool in the prevention of cerebral palsy and other adverse fetal outcomes an
d diffused rapidly into clinical practice. In the late 1970s, some sceptici
sm began to be voiced about the evidence for the effectiveness of EFM. The
authors published a systematic review of the evidence in 1979 that conclude
d that there was insufficient evidence for the effectiveness of the routine
use of EFM and a clear rise in the cesarean delivery rate associated with
its use. The analysis was based on a thorough review of approximately 600 b
ooks and articles, but focused heavily on the evidence of four randomized c
linical trials (RCTs) that had been published. An economic analysis further
underscored the importance of this issue. The report was met with harsh ad
hominem criticism from clinicians both in public venues and in the medical
literature. Subsequently, additional RCTs were conducted and other analyze
s were published, and in 1987 the American College of Obstetricians and Gyn
ecologists recommended that auscultation was an acceptable alternative to E
FM in routine labor and delivery. Yet, today EFM continues to be the standa
rd of practice, used in 80% of labors in this country. The most important c
onclusion drawn from this experience is the need to evaluate new technologi
es before their widespread diffusion into clinical practice.
Target Audience: Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians
Learning Objectives: After completion of this article, the reader will be a
ble to summarize the current state of knowledge of electronic fetal monitor
ing based on the expectations for decreasing fetal morbidity and mortality.