We examined the spatial distribution of water vote populations in four cons
ecutive years and investigated whether the regional population processes of
extinction, recolonisation and migration influence distribution and persis
tence, We examined how such regional processes are influenced by spatial va
riation in habitat quality. In addition, we assessed the relevance of metap
opulation concepts for understanding the dynamics of species that deviate f
rom classical metapopulation assumptions and developing conservation measur
es for them. Populations were patchy and discrete, and the patchy distribut
ion was not static between years. Population turnover occurred even in the
absence of predatory mink, which only influenced the network of populations
at the end of the study. Most populations were clustered close together in
the upper tributaries. Local population persistence was predominantly infl
uenced by population size: large populations were more persistent. Recoloni
sation rates were influenced by isolation and habitat quality. The isolatio
n estimates which best explained the distribution of water vote populations
incorporated straight-line distances, suggesting water votes disperse over
land. The distribution of recolonised sites indicated that dispersing votes
actively selected habitat on the basis of its quality. Water votes depart
from some of the assumptions made by frequently used metapopulation models.
In particular there is no clear binary distinction between suitable and no
n-suitable habitat. Accounting for variation in habitat quality before inve
stigating temporal changes in population distribution allowed us to demonst
rate that the key metapopulation processes were important. The significance
of regional population processes relative to local population processes ma
y have increased in declining, fragmented populations compared to pristine
regional populations. We hypothesise that although mink predation is likely
to eventually cause regional extinction in many areas, metapopulation proc
esses have delayed this decline. Consequently, conservation measures should
take into account mink predation rates and regional population processes,
before considering aspects of habitat quality.