This article explores how business process reengineering (BPR) is informed
by a masculine discourse that emphasizes competition, control and conquest
while simultaneously appealing to care, trust, nurturing, creativity and te
amwork. We explore how this contradiction is reflected in the language and
practice of management. We demonstrate some of the ways in which this contr
adiction infuses with, subverts and may ultimately undermine BPR. We locate
the debate within a contextual consideration of how reengineering is displ
acing an earlier form of masculinity within financial services which we und
erstand and describe as paternalism. It is apparent that the pre-eminence o
f masculinity was never questioned. Indeed, both paternalism and reengineer
ing simply fought over which masculinity would predominate.