In Hobbes' political theory, a commonwealth established by force is a commo
nwealth by acquisition, while a commonwealth established by the mutual agre
ement of individuals in a hobbesian State of Nature is a commonwealth by in
stitution. In this essay, I reconstruct Hobbes' account of commonwealth by
institution and its role in justifying sovereignty, filling in gaps in the
original account when necessary but remaining faithful to Hobbes' own premi
ses. I argue that according to this hobbesian reconstruction, commonwealth
by institution can produce essentially the same result as result of commonw
ealth by acquisition. This is the conclusion Hobbes wants, bu the Hobbesian
reconstruction renders commonwealth by institution a weak tool for justifi
cation. however, I propose a modified reconstruction of commonwealth by ins
titution that drops Hobbes' dubious premise that absolute monarchy is the b
est form of government. I suggest that with this modification, one can use
commonwealth by institution as a tool for justifying a democratic commonwea
lth.