Numerous studies have demonstrated that parasites with complex life-cycles
can cause phenotypic modifications in their hosts that lead to an increased
rate of transmission, and suggest that these modifications are the result
of parasitic adaptations to manipulate the host. Little attention is paid,
however, to separating the possibility of adaptive host manipulation from i
ncidental (if fortuitous) side-effects of infection. In this study we combi
ne statistical and analytical tools to interpret the impact of the macropar
asite Ligula intestinalis L. (Cestoda, Pseudophyllidea) on the behaviour of
its intermediate fish host (the roach, Rutilus rutilus L.), using field da
ta on a natural system. Two distinct sets of generalized linear models agre
e that both the presence and the intensity of infection contribute to a mod
ified behavioural response in the host. This was illustrated by a preferenc
e for the lake-edge in infected fish during autumn. Furthermore, the effect
of parasites upon their host is heterogeneous with respect to parasite siz
e, with larger parasite individuals having a disproportionate impact. A ser
ies of game-theoretic models of adaptive host manipulation illustrate a pot
ential rationale for a size-dependent manipulation strategy in parasites. T
hese findings illustrate the potential complexity and functionality of the
impact of L. intestinalis upon its fish host, which together reduce the par
simony of the alternative 'incidental effect' hypothesis.