Ii. Rosen et al., Correlation between lung fibrosis and radiation therapy dose after concurrent radiation therapy and chemotherapy for limited small cell lung cancer, RADIOLOGY, 221(3), 2001, pp. 614-622
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between physician-identified radiogra
phic fibrosis, lung tissue physical density change, and radiation dose afte
r Concurrent radiation therapy and chemotherapy for limited small cell lung
cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fibrosis volumes of different severity levels were d
elineated on computed tomography (CT) images obtained at 1-year follow-up o
f 21 patients with complete response to concurrent radiation therapy and ch
emotherapy for limited small cell lung carcinoma. Delivered treatments were
reconstructed with a three-dimensional treatment planning system and geome
trically registered to the follow-up CT images. Tissue physical density cha
nge and radiation dose were computed for each voxel within each fibrosis vo
lume and within normal lung. Patient responses were grouped per radiation a
nd chemotherapy protocol.
RESULTS: A significant correlation was noted between fibrosis grade and tis
sue physical density change and fibrosis grade. For doses less than 30 Gy,
the probability of observing fibrosis was less than 2% with conventional fr
actionation and less than 4% with accelerated fractionation. Physical lung
density change also showed a threshold of 30-35 Gy. For doses of 30-55 Gy a
nd cisplatin and etoposide (PE) chemotherapy, fibrosis probability was 2.0
times greater for accelerated fractionation compared with conventional frac
tionation (P < .005) and was correlated to increasing dose for both fractio
nation schedules.
CONCLUSION: Lung tissue physical density changes correlated well with fibro
sis incidence, and both increased with increasing dose greater than a thres
hold of 30-35 Gy. With concurrent PE chemotherapy, fibrosis probability was
twice as great with accelerated fractionation as with once-daily fractiona
tion.