Inspired by facts from the private-sector construction industry, we develop
a model that explains many stylized facts of procurement contracts. The bu
yer in our model incurs a cost of providing a comprehensive design and is f
aced with a tradeoff between providing incentives and reducing ex post tran
saction costs due to costly renegotiation. We show that cost-phis contracts
are preferred to fixed-price contracts when a project is more complex. Me
briefly discuss how fixed-price or cost-plus contracts might be preferred t
o other incentive contracts. Finally, our model provides some microfoundati
ons for ideas from Transaction Cost Economics.