We report the results of experiments designed to test recent theories of ve
rtical foreclosure. Consistent with the theory, vertical integration improv
es the upstream firm's ability to commit to restricting output to the monop
oly level, as does the use of public contracts. Public contracts are not a
perfect substitute for vertical integration, however. integration allows mo
re surplus to be extracted from the unintegrated downstream firm, a bargain
ing effect that has been underemphasized in the recent foreclosure literatu
re. Motivated by some observations that are difficult to reconcile with exi
sting theory, we extend the theory to allow downstream firms to have hetero
geneous (rather than purely passive or symmetric) out-of-equilibrium belief
s.