Epidural fentanyl speeds the onset of sensory block during epidural lidocaine anesthesia

Citation
Ch. Cherng et al., Epidural fentanyl speeds the onset of sensory block during epidural lidocaine anesthesia, REG ANES PA, 26(6), 2001, pp. 523-526
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE
ISSN journal
10987339 → ACNP
Volume
26
Issue
6
Year of publication
2001
Pages
523 - 526
Database
ISI
SICI code
1098-7339(200111/12)26:6<523:EFSTOO>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Shortening the onset time of sensory block is a practical goal to improve the quality of epidural anesthesia. The addition of fentanyl to a local anesthetic solution is widely used during epidural a nesthesia. This randomized double-blind study examined the onset time of se nsory block during epidural lidocaine anesthesia with and without added fen tanyl to the epidural solution. Methods: Thirty-six young male patients undergoing knee arthroscopy were ra ndomly allocated into 3 groups of 12 patients each: epidural fentanyl (EF, epidural administration of 17 mL of 2% lidocaine plus 100 mug fentanyl and followed by intravenous (IV) injection of 2 mL of normal saline); IV fentan yl (IF, epidural administration of 17 mL of 2% lidocaine plus 2 mL of norma l saline and followed by IV injection of 100 mug of fentanyl); and control (C, epidural administration of 17 mL of 2% lidocaine plus 2 mL of normal sa line and followed by IV injection of 2 mL of normal saline). The sensory bl ock was assessed by pinprick method. The hemodynamic changes, postepidural shivering and side effects of epidural fentanyl were also recorded. Results: There was no difference in the distribution of age, weight, and he ight among the 3 groups. The onset time of sensory block up to T-10 dermato me was significantly more rapid in the EF group (8.3 +/- 3.7 minutes) than that of the IF group (13.1 +/- 4.2 minutes, P <.05) or C group (14.2 +/- 5. 4 minutes, P <.05). The upper level of sensory block was also significantly higher in the EF group. Although the incidence of shivering was lower in t he EF group, this did not reach statistical significance. Postepidural arte rial blood pressures and heart rates were no different among the 3 groups. No nausea, vomiting, pruritus, respiratory depression, urinary retention, o r hypotension were observed in any patients. Conclusion: Epidural injection of the mixture of 100 mug fentanyl and 2% li docaine solution accelerated the onset of sensory block during epidural lid ocaine anesthesia without increased side effects.