Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is a complex and heterogeneous disease. Althoug
h most patients experience just a few symptoms, and have a good prognosis,
there are others whose symptoms are severe and progressive, determined by d
ifferent pathophysiological elements such as diastolic dysfunction, myocard
ial ischemia, arrhythmias and subaortic obstruction. Approximately 20-30% o
f hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients develop an intraventricular dynamic
gradient, which in some cases, is responsible for severe symptoms which are
ameliorated once the obstruction is reduced. In many cases the symptoms ca
n be controlled with medical treatment which includes betablockers, calcium
-channel antagonists and dysopiramide, but some patients will still experie
nce severe and refractory symptoms. This subgroup of patients, which repres
ent approximately 5-10% of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, can b
e problematic from a management perspective. For many years, septal myectom
y and/or mitral valve replacement offered the only effective alternative th
erapy for these patients. However, the high rates of morbidity and mortalit
y associated with these procedures have necessitated the search for new and
less invasive procedures such as ventricular pacing and percutaneous septa
l ablation. Although the initial results with sequential pacing were encour
aging, further studies have suggested a significant placebo effect, which m
akes its application controversial. In the last 5 years selective embolizat
ion of the septa[ artery precipitating a localized myocardial infarction ha
s been utilized to reduce the subaortic gradient. The potential indications
and efficacy of these new forms of treatment, like ventricular pacing and
percutaneous septal ablation, are presently under evaluation and are the ma
in subject of this review.
Medical treatment, with either beta-blockers, calcium channel antagonists o
r dysopiramide constitutes the first therapeutic step. Surgery, while allev
iating the subaortic obstruction and reducing the intraventicular pressure
and mitral insufficiency, produces important and long-lasting symptomatic a
nd functional improvement in most of these patients, and it continues to be
an important therapeutic alternative in these cases. If the first results
with sequential pacemaker implants were encouraging, today it is alluded to
an important placebo effect that causes its application to be controversia
l. In the last 5 years the path has been made in the creation of a septal i
nfarction located through the embolization of the septal branches to reduce
the gradient.