Conduction aphasia is usually described as a repetition impairment. Semiolo
gy or pathophysiology cannot be explained with this definition. We report a
single case particularly demonstrative. The patient showed spontaneous spe
ech, denomination, repetition and reading impairments. Main errors were pho
nemic paraphasia. No arthric disorder nor comprehension impairment was obse
rved. Damage of supramarginalis gyrus and Wernicke's area was found. A cogn
itive analysis suggested that the phonological buffer and the working memor
y were impaired. Implication for rehabilitation, which included segmentatio
n and semantisation associated to phonological training, is discussed. The
course of the conduction aphasia was good and the patient was able to work
again.