We compare and contrast several different methods for estimating the effect
of treatment when responses are paired binomial observations. The ratio of
binomial probabilities is the parameter of interest, while the binomial pr
obabilities are nuisance parameters which may vary between pairs. The appli
cation is a meta-analysis of the treatment of rectal cancer, with observati
ons in each study indicating the number of recurrences of the cancer in eac
h of two groups, one with radiation therapy and one without. The ratio of t
he probabilities of recurrence in the radiation to non-radiation groups is
of substantive interest, and is modelled as a logistic or complementary log
-log function of an unknown linear combination of the covariates. The three
methods we consider are maximum likelihood, a Bayesian approach and an app
roach based on estimating equations. For the MLE and Bayesian approach the
potentially large number of nuisance parameters are estimated together with
the parameters of interest, whereas for the estimating equation approach o
nly the parameters of interest are estimated. A simulation study is perform
ed to compare the methods and evaluate the impact of overdispersion. Copyri
ght (C) 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.