Energy and water balance studies of a snow cover during snowmelt period ata high arctic site

Citation
O. Bruland et al., Energy and water balance studies of a snow cover during snowmelt period ata high arctic site, THEOR APP C, 70(1-4), 2001, pp. 53-63
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Earth Sciences
Journal title
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY
ISSN journal
0177798X → ACNP
Volume
70
Issue
1-4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
53 - 63
Database
ISI
SICI code
0177-798X(2001)70:1-4<53:EAWBSO>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
The predicted global warming is supposed to have an enhanced effect on the arctic regions. How this will influence the water, carbon dioxide and metha ne balances in the European arctic tundra is the objective of the EU-funded project "Understanding Land Surface Physical Processes in the Arctic" (LAP P), to which where SINTEF is one of several contributors. The snow cover is one of the limiting factors for these exchange processes and knowledge of how it behaves and will behave under a different climate is important. Data collected for water and energy balance studies in an area close to Ny-Angs trom lesund at 79 degreesN at Svalbard are the basis of this study. Measure ments during the ablation periods since 1992 show an average air temperatur e for the periods of 2.1 degreesC, an average incoming shorwave radiation o f 230 W/m(2) and an average measured runoff intensity of 14 mm/day with a m aximum of 68 mm/ day. Three models of different complexity are tested in or der to simulate the water and energy balance of a snow cover on the arctic tundra. The three models are: a complex numerical model (CROCUS), a simple energy balance model and a temperature index model. The simulations were ca rried out for the melt periods in 1992 and 1996 as these two periods repres ent very different meteorological conditions. The results of these simulati ons exposed weaknesses in all the models. The energy balance model lacks ca lculation of cold content in the snowpack. This influences both the outgoin g longwave radiation and the timing of the melt. Due to the effect of compe nsating errors in the simulations, CROCUS performed better than the simple energy balance model but also this model has problems with the simulation o f outgoing longwave radiation. The temperature index model does not perform well for snowmelt studies in regions were radiation is the main driving en ergy source for the melt.