Although there is international consensus regarding the general principles
of testing for lupus anticoagulants, (LAS), no agreement exists as far as t
he analysis of the clotting time results is concerned. Twenty-nine laborato
ries participating in the Fifth International Survey of Lupus Anticoagulant
s (ISLA-5) reported the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT)based c
lotting times obtained on seven defined test samples and a normal plasma (N
P) using the same two reagents with low and high phospholipid (PL) concentr
ations, respectively. These clotting times were used to analyse how various
methods of calculating the results may influence the apparent sensitivity
of LA tests. We found that the use of a separate screening test may lead to
the exclusion of samples where the presence of LA would have been detected
by a combined screening and confirmatory method. For instance, the dilute
APTT (dAPTT) gave a sensitivity of 53.5% (screening test), while the calcul
ation of a ratio between the clotting times obtained with two different PL
concentrations gave a sensitivity of 68.1% (confirmatory test). The normali
sation of results by dividing with the corresponding results of NP increase
d the apparent sensitivity. The screening test ratio between dAPTT results
of test samples and NP gave a sensitivity of 84.7%. The normalised ratio be
tween the clotting times obtained with the two reagents (lupus ratio, LIZ)
gave a sensitivity of 95.1%. We conclude that when testing for LA, all samp
les should be tested with both low (screening procedure) and high (confirma
tory procedure) PL concentrations. These two clotting times should be evalu
ated in relation to each other and to the corresponding results obtained wi
th a reference plasma (normalisation). (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All r
ights reserved.