The evaluation of clotting times in the laboratory detection of lupus anticoagulants

Citation
Em. Jacobsen et al., The evaluation of clotting times in the laboratory detection of lupus anticoagulants, THROMB RES, 104(4), 2001, pp. 275-282
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
THROMBOSIS RESEARCH
ISSN journal
00493848 → ACNP
Volume
104
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
275 - 282
Database
ISI
SICI code
0049-3848(20011115)104:4<275:TEOCTI>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
Although there is international consensus regarding the general principles of testing for lupus anticoagulants, (LAS), no agreement exists as far as t he analysis of the clotting time results is concerned. Twenty-nine laborato ries participating in the Fifth International Survey of Lupus Anticoagulant s (ISLA-5) reported the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT)based c lotting times obtained on seven defined test samples and a normal plasma (N P) using the same two reagents with low and high phospholipid (PL) concentr ations, respectively. These clotting times were used to analyse how various methods of calculating the results may influence the apparent sensitivity of LA tests. We found that the use of a separate screening test may lead to the exclusion of samples where the presence of LA would have been detected by a combined screening and confirmatory method. For instance, the dilute APTT (dAPTT) gave a sensitivity of 53.5% (screening test), while the calcul ation of a ratio between the clotting times obtained with two different PL concentrations gave a sensitivity of 68.1% (confirmatory test). The normali sation of results by dividing with the corresponding results of NP increase d the apparent sensitivity. The screening test ratio between dAPTT results of test samples and NP gave a sensitivity of 84.7%. The normalised ratio be tween the clotting times obtained with the two reagents (lupus ratio, LIZ) gave a sensitivity of 95.1%. We conclude that when testing for LA, all samp les should be tested with both low (screening procedure) and high (confirma tory procedure) PL concentrations. These two clotting times should be evalu ated in relation to each other and to the corresponding results obtained wi th a reference plasma (normalisation). (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All r ights reserved.