Objectives. To evaluate two methods of measuring the prostate volume using
transrectal ultrasonography. The measurements were performed in vivo at pre
planning and again preoperatively in connection with brachytherapy. The acc
urate measurement of the prostate volume is important in a brachytherapy pr
ogram for treatment planning.
Methods. A total of 43 patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer underwen
t prospective determination of the prostate volume, by one physician, using
transrectal ultrasonography. Volume calculations were made at the preplann
ing and preoperative settings, both by a hand-held rectal probe using the p
rolate ellipsoid formula and by a mounted probe in a stepping device using
the planimetric method.
Results. The coefficient of variation between the preplanning and preoperat
ive prostate volumes with the probe holder was less than 3% compared with t
he hand-held probe, which was greater than 10%. The difference between the
median values at the preplanning and preoperative settings by serial planim
etry was 2.5 cm(3) (range 0.2 to 9.4). The difference in the median volumes
between the preplanning and preoperative ellipsoid calculations was 6.7 cm
(3) (range 0.3 to 38.7). The difference between the median values with the
ellipsoid volume was significant (P < 0.001). The Pearson correlation coeff
icient for all values using the planimetric method was 0.92 versus 0.58 for
the ellipsoid method. The correlation coefficient was significantly greate
r for the planimetric method (P < 0.001).
Conclusions. On the basis of these data, planimetric prostate volume determ
ination, by a single ultrasonographer, is an accurate and reproducible meth
od with applicability to a brachytherapy program. (C) 2001, Elsevier Scienc
e Inc.