In this comparative study, three different mutagenesis kits, namely the Mut
aGene phagemid in vitro mutagenesis kit (Bio-Rad), the Transformera Site-Di
rected mutagenesis kit (Clontech) and the Quik-change site-directed mutagen
esis kit (Stratagene) were used for the mutagenesis of IPNS genes. However,
a large difference in mutation efficiencies among these kits was encounter
ed. Furthermore, these kits employ different strategies with its own indivi
dual strengths and weaknesses. Thus, a comparison among these three kits to
evaluate their usefulness and improvements on the strategy adopted by the
Quik-change site-directed mutagenesis kit, which was the kit of choice for
our work, are presented for the benefit of research work.