Sa. Robertson et al., Effects of acetylpromazine or morphine on urine production in halothane-anesthetized dogs, AM J VET RE, 62(12), 2001, pp. 1922-1927
Objective-To assess the influence of preanesthetic administration of acetyl
promazine or morphine and fluids on urine production, arginine vasopressin
(AVP; previously known as antidiuretic hormone) concentrations, mean arteri
al blood pressure (MAP), plasma osmolality (Osm), PCV, and concentration of
total solids (TS) during anesthesia and surgery in dogs.
Animals-19 adult dogs.
Procedure-Concentration of AVP indirect MAP Osm, PCV, and concentration of
TS were measured at 5 time points (before administration of acetylpromazine
or morphine, after administration of those drugs, after induction of anest
hesia, I hour after the start of surgery, and 2 hours after the start of su
rgery). Urine output and end-tidal halothane concentrations were measured 1
and 2 hours after the start of surgery. All dogs were administered lactate
d Ringer's solution (20 ml/kg of body weight/h, IV) during surgery.
Results-Compared with values for acetylpromazine, preoperative administrati
on of morphine resulted in significantly lower urine output during the surg
ical period. Groups did not differ significantly for AVP concentration, Osm
, MAP and end-tidal halothane concentration; however, PCV and concentration
of TS decreased over time in both groups and were lower in dogs given acet
ylpromazine.
Conclusions and Clinical Relevance-Preanesthetic administration of morphine
resulted in significantly lower urine output, compared with values after a
dministration of acetylpromazine, which cannot be explained by differences
in AVP concentration or MAP When urine output is used as a guide for determ
ining rate for IV administration of fluids in the perioperative period, the
type of preanesthetic agent used must be considered.