RELIABILITY, VALIDITY, AND COMPOSITION OF A SUBSET OF THE CENTERS-FOR-DISEASE-CONTROL AND PREVENTION ACQUIRED-IMMUNODEFICIENCY-SYNDROME KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE IN A SAMPLE OF HOMELESS AND IMPOVERISHED ADULTS
B. Leake et al., RELIABILITY, VALIDITY, AND COMPOSITION OF A SUBSET OF THE CENTERS-FOR-DISEASE-CONTROL AND PREVENTION ACQUIRED-IMMUNODEFICIENCY-SYNDROME KNOWLEDGE QUESTIONNAIRE IN A SAMPLE OF HOMELESS AND IMPOVERISHED ADULTS, Medical care, 35(8), 1997, pp. 747-755
OBJECTIVES. Measures of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-rela
ted knowledge that have good psychometric properties are needed to eva
luate the impact of educational interventions, particularly among impo
verished populations. Few measures that satisfy these requirements are
available. The authors describe the psychometric characteristics and
composition of a subset of 21 AIDS knowledge items from the questionna
ire used by the National Center for Health Statistics. METHODS. The st
udy was conducted with a convenience sample of women and their signifi
cant others or close friends in nine homeless shelters and 11 resident
ial drug recovery programs in the skid row area of Los Angeles from 19
91 to 1993. Trained nurses and outreach workers collected data from 48
6 predominately African-American adults before delivery of well-establ
ished, culturally sensitive AIDS educational intervention. A subset of
334 participants were re-interviewed 6 months later. RESULTS. A total
scale score was calculated from a one-factor solution, and two subsca
le scores were formed based on a two-factor solution. One subscale was
composed of primarily cognitive items, whereas the second subscale co
ntained mainly transmission-related items. The internal consistency re
liability of the overall scale was 0.89; the two subscales had alphas
of 0.80 and 0.92. The measures have face validity, and support for con
vergent validity was found. Further, even though AIDS knowledge in the
sample was relatively high, all three measures showed marked improvem
ent in the sub-sample of respondents who were re-interviewed after rec
eiving AIDS-related educational information. CONCLUSIONS. These measur
es show promise for assessing AIDS knowledge and the efficacy of AIDS
education programs in vulnerable populations. The findings reported he
re, however, are preliminary. Test-retest reliability needs to be exam
ined, and additional studies are needed with samples that are more cul
turally diverse and include socially isolated individuals.