Sf. Wong et al., Sonographic estimation of fetal weight in macrosomic fetuses: diabetic versus non-diabetic pregnancies, AUST NZ J O, 41(4), 2001, pp. 429-432
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine
Journal title
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY
The objective of this study is to compare the accuracy of sonographic estim
ation of fetal weight of macrosomic babies in diabetic vs non-diabetic preg
nancies. Ali babies weighing 4000 g or more at birth, and who had ultrasoun
d scans performed within one week of delivery were included in this retrosp
ective study. Pregnancies with diabetes mellitus were compared to those wit
hout diabetes mellitus. The mean simple error (actual birthweight - estimat
ed fetal weight); mean standardised absolute error (absolute value of simpl
e error (g)/actual birthweight (kg)); and the percentage of estimated birth
weight falling within 15% of the actual birthweight between the two groups
were compared.
There were 9516 deliveries during the study period. Of this total 1211 (12.
7 %) babies weighed 4000 g or more. A total of 56 non-diabetic pregnancies
and 19 diabetic pregnancies were compared. The average sonographic estimati
on of fetal weight in diabetic pregnancies was 8 % less than the actual bir
thweight, compared to 0.2 % in the non-diabetic group (p < 0.01). The estim
ated fetal weight was within 15% of the birthweight in 74 % of the diabetic
pregnancies, compared to 93 % of the non-diabetic pregnancies (p < 0.05).
In the diabetic group, 26.3 % of the birthweights were underestimated by mo
re than 15 %, compared to 5.4 % in the non-diabetic group (p < 0.05).
In conclusion, the prediction accuracy of fetal weight estimation using sta
ndard formulae in macrosomic fetuses is significantly worse in diabetic pre
gnancies compared to non-diabetic pregnancies. When sonographic fetal weigh
t estimation is used to influence the mode of delivery for diabetic women,
a more conservative cut-off needs to be considered.