Conservative or operative treatment of numeral head fractures in the elderly?

Authors
Citation
H. Lill et C. Josten, Conservative or operative treatment of numeral head fractures in the elderly?, CHIRURG, 72(11), 2001, pp. 1224
Citations number
94
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
CHIRURG
ISSN journal
00094722 → ACNP
Volume
72
Issue
11
Year of publication
2001
Database
ISI
SICI code
0009-4722(200111)72:11<1224:COOTON>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
The humeral head fracture in the elderly represents an unresolved problem, which is reflected by the variety of existing therapeutic strategies rangin g from conservative treatment to humeral head replacement. The main factors influencing the prognostic outcome are the fracture type, age of the patie nt and biologic criteria such as osteoporosis, blood supply at the fragment s, and the degree of soft tissue trauma. For selection of the optimal treat ment, the general condition of the patient, additional injuries and chronic diseases have to be respected as much as the patient's compliance and pers onal demands. According to experimental and clinical findings, for displace d two- and three-part fractures of the elderly patient minimal osteosynthes is and in the future plate osteosynthesis with angular stability should be preferred. For these fracture types, conservative treatment must be include d in the therapeutic spectrum. In contrast, displaced four-part fractures a nd fracture dislocations are indications for primary humeral head replaceme nt. This is explained by the fact that neither conservative treatment nor s urgical reconstruction procedures meet the main goal of primary therapy, ai ming for early painless mobilization and for timely discharging the elderly patients in their social environment.