Morphometric examination of straight, tapered titanium stems - A retrievalstudy

Citation
G. Bohm et al., Morphometric examination of straight, tapered titanium stems - A retrievalstudy, CLIN ORTHOP, (393), 2001, pp. 13-24
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH
ISSN journal
0009921X → ACNP
Issue
393
Year of publication
2001
Pages
13 - 24
Database
ISI
SICI code
0009-921X(200112):393<13:MEOSTT>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
Cementless straight, tapered rectangular cross section titanium steins have been used by the senior author since 1979. Thirty-four stems retrieved pos tmortem, after between 10 days and 15.2 years in situ, were studied morphom etrically and histologically. Nineteen steins were first generation (1979-1 986), with an incomplete sagittal taper and a mean surface roughness of 1 m um (Ra 1.23 +/- 0.3 mum); 15 stems were second generation after 1986, with a full biplane taper and a mean surface roughness of 4 mum (Ra 4.14 +/- 0.3 6 mum). Implant surface bony coverage was determined morphometrically in 10 segments of the stems, and expressed as a bone implant contact index. Hist ologically, there were no differences between implants with different level s of roughness. Morphometrically, the first-generation steins showed signif icant differences in coverage (distal > proximal); second-generation stems had a more uniform pattern. Stems retrieved early after arthroplasty had a mean bone implant contact index of 10%. The mean bone im-plant contact inde x showed attainment of maximum coverage by 5 years after arthroplasty, with out additional apposition or loss thereafter. Patients younger than 65 year s at arthroplasty bad similar bone implant contact indices to patients 65 y ears or older; coverage in the six patients 80 years of age at retrieval di d not differ from the rates in the other patients. Morphometry was able to provide objective evidence of design change effects. No differences in cove rage were found in terms of times in situ, patient age at arthroplasty and at retrieval, and degree of stem surface roughness.