The documentation amassed in these provisional assessments of the changing
terms and conditions of psychiatric work amounts to a reconfiguring of the
moral economy of care - those root value-laden assumptions about what const
itutes proper conduct in a service or treatment context. Such a transformat
ion appears to have been in the works for some time, but the acuity with wh
ich it afflicts the consciousness of present-day actors suggests that a thr
eshold has been crossed. The loss of "slippage'' in everyday clinical work,
limited recourse of those who would resist the trend, deep "persuasive'' i
mpact on non-believers of being forced to "go through the motions,'' all ar
gue that the ethos of psychiatric work has been thoroughly infiltrated by e
fficiency, with costs yet to be reckoned. Anthropology may have been slow t
o take cognizance of such trends, but its improvisational methods and flexi
ble tools should be of use in mapping such costs, direct and indirect, and
any countervailing benefits.