The differential diagnosis of fibroadenomas vs phyliodes tumours by fine ne
edle aspiration (FNA) cytology is not possible in the majority of cases. Th
e present study aims to look at common and dissimilar features to allow dif
ferentiation, if possible. We reviewed the FNA findings of 18 histologicall
y proven phyllodes tumours and 18 fibroadenomas, checking in each case the
epithelial features, the stromal features, and any atypia. Using a semi-qua
ntitative score assessed by two observers we were able in most cases to dis
tinguish a phyllodes tumour from a fibroadenoma. The most important criteri
a were larger stromal fragments, numerous plump stromal bare nuclei, and th
e higher ratio of stromal bare nuclei to epithelial bare nuclei in phyllode
s tumours. In the present study, an original diagnosis of phyllodes tumour
was made in 7/18 (38.9%) cases but with our criteria this could be improved
to 15/18 (83.3%) cases. Therefore, the presence of specific stromal featur
es in a dimorphic cellular pattern should suggest the correct diagnosis and
differentiate its appearance from a cellular fibroadenoma.