Mitigating an organization's future net carbon emissions by native forest restoration

Authors
Citation
Gmj. Hall, Mitigating an organization's future net carbon emissions by native forest restoration, ECOL APPL, 11(6), 2001, pp. 1622-1633
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS
ISSN journal
10510761 → ACNP
Volume
11
Issue
6
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1622 - 1633
Database
ISI
SICI code
1051-0761(200112)11:6<1622:MAOFNC>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
Forest establishment has been proposed to moderate recent rises in atmosphe ric CO2 concentration. This study investigated the long-term feasibility of undertaking forest restoration to balance an organization's net carbon emi ssions. Native forests were chosen because they can retain high levels of c arbon biomass under a wide range of environmental conditions. For a site ne ar Christchurch, New Zealand (latitude 43.32 degrees S, longitude 172 degre es E), an individual-based forest model (LINKNZ) predicted, in the absence of large-scale disturbance, newly established conifer-dominated forest woul d store similar to 400 Mg C/ha after 350 yr, gradually declining to similar to 300 Mg C/ha as succession proceeded. Future net carbon emissions, initi alized at 250 Mg C, were examined under four scenarios: 1%/yr growth; const ant level; decline to an asymptote; and 1%/yr decline. Depending on the sce nario, the minimum area needed to balance accumulated forest carbon biomass against net carbon emissions doubled from 65 ha to 138 ha, time to attain a balance extended from 28 yr to > 300 yr, and the period in surplus lasted from 4 yr to 70 yr. The forest model showed that, by taking the forest dyn amics into account, the timing and duration of a positive carbon balance co uld be markedly improved. For example, under net emission growth of 1%/yr, a 5% increase in area from the minimum needed to reach a balance prolonged the surplus sixfold and shifted the balance date from year 28 to year 17. T he nonlinear relationship between the minimum forest area and the balance d ate gave an optimal choice under each scenario. Management of the organizat ion's carbon emission levels largely determined the long-term viability of establishing forest to balance net emissions. To balance emissions by year 100, assuming a 1%/yr growth from 250 Mg C/ha, required restoring > 230 ha in forest; in comparison < 90 ha would suffice if emissions could be reduce d 1%/yr. Over longer periods the analysis suggested an organization would h ave to restrain or reduce net carbon emission levels to avoid diverting con siderable resources into forest restoration. In general, the results suppor ted global-scale predictions on the viability of establishing forests to re duce carbon levels.