We present a population viability model for an arboreal gecko (Oedura retic
ulata). This gecko needs a habitat of smooth-barked Eucalyptus woodlands. I
n Western Australia its distribution has declined dramatically, largely thr
ough clearance of woodlands, but populations persist within woodland remnan
ts. Evidence from extensive field data suggests that the gecko was formerly
distributed through much of the original eucalypt woodlands, and that geck
os show little movement between patches. The populations in all woodland re
mnants seem to be isolated. We ask whether the present distribution of the
gecko across remnants could have been produced solely by the extinction of
populations through demographic stochasticity.
To test this possibility, we developed a stochastic, individual-based model
including environmental stochasticity and estimated the percentage of exti
nct populations of different size from known field characteristics and the
time span since the clearing of the woodland. The model predicted a relatio
nship between remnant size and gecko persistence, driven by demographic sto
chasticity, that is qualitatively similar to the observed pattern. Despite
extensive testing, however, we found that the model predicted an incidence
function much too optimistic for the observed distribution of populations i
n small remnants. This discrepancy between field data and our model is due
to a series of implicit assumptions. Thus, our modeling exercise sheds ligh
t on the procedures commonly applied to population viability analyses of si
ngle populations of endangered species. The implicit assumptions involved i
n such models make many predictions vague. We suggest that for the study of
declining species like O. reticulata it is essential to adequately test ex
tinction models and therefore population viability analyses.