Key policy documents relating to the 'knowledge-driven economy' show that p
olicy makers, university heads and other interested academics have come to
view the task of creating science-based industries through the lens of ente
rprise ideology. Proceeding on the assumption that the scientific fundament
als are already in place, the belief is that industrial applications can be
achieved by infusions of enterprise. Such a framing is attractive to those
unwilling or unable to engage with the complexities of scientific research
or new product development. It offers a surface intelligibility combined w
ith an apparent amenability to straightforward policy interventions.
At the same time it is quite unclear, apart from the taking of risks, what
attributes and behaviours are actually involved in enterprise. Even the rel
evance of risk is questionable. Despite the ideological pressure to demonst
rate a link between entrepreneurship and risk, none of the relevant researc
h has succeeded in doing so. Nor has risk been a prevalent feature of new v
enture creation in general and science-based start-ups in particular.
The policy is an act of faith, based neither on research nor on experience.
Its reliance on enterprise is less a solution than a hope that one will sp
ontaneously appear.