B. Mullen et al., Crossed categorization versus simple categorization and intergroup evaluations: a meta-analysis, EUR J SOC P, 31(6), 2001, pp. 721-736
Crossed categorization typically refers to the crossing of two dichotomous
social dimensions, resulting in four groups (double-ingroup, two mixed grou
ps, and double-outgroup). This paper reports the results of a meta-analysis
comparing the effects of crossed categorization on intergroup evaluations
with the effects of simple categorization on intergroup evaluations. The cr
ossed categorization paradigm is shown to increase or decrease ingroup bias
, depending on how ingroup bias is defined in the crossed categorization pa
radigm. Moreover, just as in simple categorization, ingroup bias in crossed
categorization is shown to be greater when the proportionate size of the i
ngroup is smaller. However, contrary to the patterns established in simple
categorization, the reality of the group categorizations does not increase
ingroup bias in crossed categorization. We discuss the implications of thes
e results for future research on intergroup evaluations. Copyright (C) 2001
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.