Evaluation of the clinical value of urinary NMP22 as a marker in the screening and surveillance of transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder

Citation
R. Chahal et al., Evaluation of the clinical value of urinary NMP22 as a marker in the screening and surveillance of transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder, EUR UROL, 40(4), 2001, pp. 415-420
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
EUROPEAN UROLOGY
ISSN journal
03022838 → ACNP
Volume
40
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
415 - 420
Database
ISI
SICI code
0302-2838(200110)40:4<415:EOTCVO>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
Purpose:To prospectively evaluate the clinical role of urinary NMP22 as a m arker for transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder in screening a nd surveillance settings. Patients and Methods: Single voided specimens were obtained from 211 consec utive patients who presented for flexible cystoscopy. Of these, 96 patients presented with haematuria or irritative symptoms (screening), the remainin g 115 were patients with known transitional cell carcinoma on follow-up (su rveillance). The urine sample was used for urine microscopy, cytology and f or measuring NMP22 levels. Results: Bladder tumours were found in 16 of 96 (16.6%) patients in the scr eening group and 17 of 115 (15.6%) patients on surveillance. The NMP22 leve ls were significantly lower in patients with lower stage (Ta vs. T1-3), low grade (G1, G2 vs. G3, CIS) and papillary morphology. The optimum threshold for NMP22 obtained from the ROC curve was 4.75 U/ml, providing a sensitivi ty, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 42.4, 85, 38.5 and 88.6%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity were b etter in patients being screened than in those on surveillance. In both gro ups, urinary NMP22 had similar diagnostic characteristics as urinary cytolo gy. Conclusions: Urinary NMP22 levels are significantly higher in patients with bladder tumour than in those negative for tumours, and test predictability improves with increasing stage and grade. The overall sensitivity for urin ary NMP22 is similar to, but not superior to urine cytology. Our study sugg ests that the clinical role of urinary NMP22 as a diagnostic marker can be at best supportive only. Copyright (C) 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel.