The systematic development and application of biomarkers in environmental h
ealth risk assessment is a relatively new field. At first, the major intere
st was in biomarkers of exposure, borrowing concepts from pharmacology, the
n it moved from the external estimates of exposure to internal measures of
dose, and ultimately, to markers of target dose. While these markers provid
e evidence of exposures, they do not provide evidence of that toxicological
damage has occurred. For this reason, measurements of DNA adducts and prot
ein adducts are of interest, since they may provide bridges between exposur
es and disease end-points. In parallel, more quantitative and more sensitiv
e end-points for diseases have been sought. Again, with advancing technique
s in cytogenetics, extensive studies were conducted on such markers as chro
mosomal aberrations, micronuclei and other changes deemed to represent geno
mic damage. However, these types of end-points are quite unspecific for app
lication to new hazards of uncertain human toxic (carcinogenic) potential.
Recent work focusing on more specific early-effect markers such as certain
oncogenes and tumour-suppressor genes have substantial promise as shown by
work with aflatoxins and vinyl chloride. Such studies have also enhanced me
chanistic insight. The advances in molecular genetics have led to an upsurg
e in interest in most susceptibility factors, and identification of polymor
phisms of various enzymes has become possible. Ongoing search for "ultra-hi
gh risk" individuals may be fruitful, but probably only relevant to a small
segment of potentially exposed populations. Factors associated with a smal
l differential risk, however theoretically or mechanistically important, of
fer only little practical use.