A longitudinal study on mandibular implants supporting an overdenture: Theinfluence of retention mechanism and anatomic-prosthetic variables on periimplant parameters
M. Oetterli et al., A longitudinal study on mandibular implants supporting an overdenture: Theinfluence of retention mechanism and anatomic-prosthetic variables on periimplant parameters, INT J PROST, 14(6), 2001, pp. 536-542
Purpose: The aim of this 5-year longitudinal study was to investigate the i
nfluence of the retention mechanism for overdenture fixation on the periimp
lant parameters of mandibular implants. Materials and Methods: Ninety edent
ulous patients, each with two interforaminal implants supporting an overden
ture, participated in the study. They had received either a straight or sli
ghtly bent round clip bar, a U-shaped rigid bar with or without distal exte
nsions, or single-ball anchors. Anatomic-morphologic and prosthetic variabl
es were assessed related to the implant position and the type of overdentur
e retention. The degree of mandibular atrophy was determined using cephalom
etric radiographs. The angle beta between the virtual axis connecting both
implants and the mandibular hinge axis was measured on mounted casts. A sup
porting surface was identified between bent clip bars and U-shaped extensio
n bars. Clinical periimplant parameters were recorded, and changes of the p
robing attachment level after 5 years were analyzed in 70 patients with res
pect to the retention device and an atomic-morphologic and prosthetic varia
bles. Results: A significant increase of the Plaque index was observed afte
r 5 years. The mean clinical attachment loss after 5 years was about 0.2 mm
. In more than 50%, beta was small, ie, less than or equal to 5 degrees. Fo
r these implants, loss of clinical attachment was significantly lower. The
correlation between attachment loss and beta was weak, while no significant
correlation was found with regard to the degree of atrophy and surface. Co
nclusion: In view of the long observation period, it was concluded that the
position and retention mechanism of mandibular implants supporting an over
denture have little influence on the long-term stability of the clinical pa
rameters.