Influence of occlusal factors on treatment outcome: A study of 109 consecutive patients with mandibular implant-supported fixed prostheses opposing maxillary complete dentures
A. Wennerberg et al., Influence of occlusal factors on treatment outcome: A study of 109 consecutive patients with mandibular implant-supported fixed prostheses opposing maxillary complete dentures, INT J PROST, 14(6), 2001, pp. 550-555
Purpose: This study was undertaken to investigate the relationship between
occlusal variables and clinical and radiologic findings as well as patient
response to treatment outcome in patients with mandibular implant-supported
fixed prostheses opposing maxillary complete dentures. Materials and Metho
ds: The study group consisted of 109 consecutive patients attending for ann
ual control. They had received their mandibular implant-supported prosthese
s according to the Branemark system on average 8 years previously (range 1
to 27 years). All patients were interviewed with standardized questions by
one examiner, who also performed the clinical examination. The questions fo
cused on the patients' opinion on masticatory and prosthetic function and p
roblems. The clinical examination comprised occlusal and prosthetic factors
and the health of the oral mucosa. Results: The great majority of the pati
ents were very satisfied with their present dental situation and masticator
y function. Two thirds reported no problems with their maxillary complete d
entures at all. Balanced occlusion was found bilaterally in 61%, and a furt
her 4% had balanced function on one side. More than one third thus lacked b
alanced occlusion. Only about 60% had optimal occlusion, and 8% had poor oc
clusion according to common prosthodontic criteria. This was interpreted as
a continuing impairment of the occlusion with time. The mean bone loss was
0.5 mm, according to available radiographs, for a mean observation period
of 54 months. There were no or only weak correlations between the variables
examined. Conclusion: The occlusal factors registered were of limited impo
rtance for patient satisfaction and treatment outcome recorded clinically a
nd radiographically at follow-up examination of the actual prosthodontic re
habilitation.