A. Rasmusson et E. Gizeli, Comparison of Poly(methylmethacrylate) and Novolak waveguide coatings for an acoustic biosensor, J APPL PHYS, 90(12), 2001, pp. 5911-5914
In order to optimize the geometry of the acoustic waveguide biosensor, the
performance of the device was assessed for two different guiding layers: a
photeresist (Novolak) and a polymer Poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA) one. In
itially, the effect of the thickness of each layer on the insertion loss of
the device and frequency of the wave was monitored. The 1.5 and 1.7 mum No
volak and PMMA, respectively, coated devices were used to monitor the bindi
ng of Immunoglobulin G to the protein A activated device surface. Both devi
ces were found to exhibit the same phase sensitivity to protein deposition.
However, Novolak waveguides showed a higher stability in contact with wate
r, making them more suitable for biosensing applications than PMMA waveguid
es. Finally, the reproducibility of the Novolak-coated waveguide was studie
d during the formation of the polymer layer, addition of buffer, and antibo
dy binding. (C) 2001 American Institute of Physics.