Cyproheptadine versus propranolol for the treatment of acute neuroleptic-induced akathisia: A comparative double-blind study

Citation
T. Fischel et al., Cyproheptadine versus propranolol for the treatment of acute neuroleptic-induced akathisia: A comparative double-blind study, J CL PSYCH, 21(6), 2001, pp. 612-615
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology,"Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
ISSN journal
02710749 → ACNP
Volume
21
Issue
6
Year of publication
2001
Pages
612 - 615
Database
ISI
SICI code
0271-0749(200112)21:6<612:CVPFTT>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of cyproheptadine , an antiserotonergic agent, in the treatment of neuroleptic-induced akathi sia (NLA), as compared with propranolol, the current gold standard. In a do uble-blind trial, 30 patients with schizophrenia and NLA received either cy proheptadine 16 mg/day (N = 18) or propranolol 80 mg/day (N = 12) for 4 day s, followed by 3 days without any anti-NIA treatment. The Barnes Akahisia S cale, Simpson-Angus Extrapyramidal Effects Rating Scale, and Brief Psychiat ric Rating Scale were used to assess the severity of NIA, parkinsonism, and psychosis, respectively. In both groups, the severity of NIA decreased sig nificantly over time (cyproheptadine, -46%; propranolol, -42%), with no sig nificant intergroup difference. The NIA symptoms worsened significantly whe n cyproheptadine and propranolol were discontinued. We conclude that cyproh eptadine 16 mg/day is as effective as propranolol for the treatment of acut e NIA. The antiakathisic effect of cyproheptadine may be mostly attributabl e to its serotonin antagonistic activity.