Acetone and acetonitrile in the tropical Indian Ocean boundary layer and free troposphere: Aircraft-based intercomparison of AP-CIMS and PTR-MS measurements

Citation
D. Sprung et al., Acetone and acetonitrile in the tropical Indian Ocean boundary layer and free troposphere: Aircraft-based intercomparison of AP-CIMS and PTR-MS measurements, J GEO RES-A, 106(D22), 2001, pp. 28511-28527
Citations number
54
Categorie Soggetti
Earth Sciences
Volume
106
Issue
D22
Year of publication
2001
Pages
28511 - 28527
Database
ISI
SICI code
Abstract
We have performed aircraft-borne intercomparison measurements of acetone an d acetonitrile using two different mass spectrometric techniques: A Proton Transfer Reaction Mass Spectrometer (PTR-MS) operated and developed by the Institute of Ion Physics, University of Innsbruck, and an Atmospheric Press ure Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometer (AP-CIMS) operated and developed by the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz. The two devices were empl oyed for atmospheric trace gas measurements over the Indian Ocean on board the National Center for Atmospheric Research C-130 research aircraft during the Indian Ocean Experiment (INDOEX) intensive field phase in February and March 1999. Both instruments use reactions of ions with atmospheric trace gas molecules and mass spectrometric detection techniques for the determina tion of trace gas concentrations. For the detection of acetone and acetonit rile, both mass spectrometers operate in the positive ion mode and detect t he protonated species of these compounds. One difference of the two systems is the operating pressure of the reaction chamber, where the ion molecule reactions take place. While the PTR-MS uses a low-pressure (2.2 hPa) drift tube, a much higher pressure of 300 hPa is used by the AP-CIMS. Other diffe rences are the determination of background concentrations and the calibrati on procedure. The AP-CIMS uses a charcoal filter, and the PTR-MS uses a Pt catalyst. For the AP-CIMS an on-line calibration is necessary, which is per formed during the flights. The intercomparison measurements described here were carried out on two research flights along a north-south transect along 73 degreesE between 6 degreesN and 8 degreesS. Altitudes between 100 in an d 6500 in above sea level were covered. Backward trajectory analyses indica te that the sampled air was taken from polluted air masses originating from India and the Bay of Bengal as well as from remote southern hemispheric ai r. During the two flights on February 20 and 24 the position of the Intertr opical Convergence Zone was located around 1.5 degreesS in the investigated area. The measurements of both instruments of acetone and acetonitrile ind icate a strong gradient in the boundary layer and a weaker one in the free troposphere. The values measured by the PTR-MS are higher than the ones by the AP-CIMS, but are within the combined error range of +/- 20-30% for each instrument. Acetone mixing ratios up to 2.5 parts per billion (ppb) and ac etonitrile up to 0.4 ppb were measured in the northern hemispheric boundary layer. The measurements in the free troposphere give values between 0.3 pp b and 1.0 ppb for acetone and 0.12 ppb and 0.3 ppb for acetonitrile.