Process controls of water balance variability in a large semi-arid catchment: downward approach to hydrological model development

Citation
C. Jothityangkoon et al., Process controls of water balance variability in a large semi-arid catchment: downward approach to hydrological model development, J HYDROL, 254(1-4), 2001, pp. 174-198
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology,"Civil Engineering
Journal title
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
ISSN journal
00221694 → ACNP
Volume
254
Issue
1-4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
174 - 198
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-1694(200112)254:1-4<174:PCOWBV>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
The process controls on water balance are examined at the annual, monthly a nd daily scales. A systematic 'downward' approach for the formulation of mo dels of appropriate complexity is presented based on an investigation of th e climate, soil and vegetation controls on water balance. Starting with a s imple model, complexity is added in steps, with the models tested progressi vely against signatures of runoff variability at each time scale. The inter -annual variability of runoff is the first signature considered, followed b y the intra-annual (mean monthly) variation of runoff. The flow duration cu rve is the third key signature and is used to test predictions of the daily water balance model. These analyses are carried out using observed data fr om the Collie River Basin in Western Australia. At the annual time scale, a simple water balance model including saturation excess overland flow and e vaporation is found adequate, provided spatial variability of soil depths a nd rainfall are introduced through multiple buckets. At the monthly time sc ale, additional processes are required-the key process is subsurface runoff , but in our case we also separated total evapotranspiration into bare soil evaporation and transpiration to represent the heterogeneous vegetation co ver. At the daily time scale, inclusion of non-linearity in the storage-dis charge relationship for subsurface runoff generation was important, and mor e crucially, the inclusion of a deeper groundwater store to capture prolong ed low flows was important. Model predictions were very sensitive to the as sumed distribution of soil depths, both within each subcatchment, and betwe en subcatchments on a regional basis. Streamflow routing was important for large catchments to capture high flows. The overall conclusion is that in t his semi-arid catchment. spatial variability of soil depths appear to be th e most important control on runoff variability at all time and space scales , followed by the spatial variability of climate and vegetation cover. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.