Lipopolysaccharide-induced increase of prostaglandin E-2 is mediated by inducible nitric oxide synthase activation of the constitutive cyclooxygenaseand induction of membrane-associated prostaglandin E synthase
Y. Devaux et al., Lipopolysaccharide-induced increase of prostaglandin E-2 is mediated by inducible nitric oxide synthase activation of the constitutive cyclooxygenaseand induction of membrane-associated prostaglandin E synthase, J IMMUNOL, 167(7), 2001, pp. 3962-3971
NO produced by the inducible NO synthase (NOS2) and prostanoids generated b
y the cyclooxygenase (COX) isoforms and terminal prostanoid synthases are m
ajor components of the host innate immune and inflammatory response. Eviden
ce exists that pharmacological manipulation of one pathway could result in
cross-modulation of the other, but the sense, amplitude, and relevance of t
hese interactions are controversial, especially in vivo. Administration of
6 mg/kg LPS to rats i.p. resulted 6 h later in induction of NOS2 and the me
mbrane-associated PGE synthase (mPGES) expression, and decreased constituti
ve COX (COX-1) expression. Low level inducible COX (COX-2) mRNA with absent
COX-2 protein expression was observed. The NOS2 inhibitor aminoguanidine (
50 and 100 mg/kg i.p.) dose dependently decreased both NO and prostanoid pr
oduction. The LPS-induced increase in PGE(2) concentration was mediated by
NOS2-derived NO-dependent activation of COX-1 pathway and by induction of m
PGES. Despite absent COX-2 protein, SC-236, a putative COX-2-specific inhib
itor, decreased mPGES RNA expression and PGE(2) concentration. Ketoprofen,
a nonspecific COX inhibitor, and SC-236 had no effect on the NOS2 pathway.
Our results suggest that in a model of systemic inflammation characterized
by the absence of COX-2 protein expression, NOS2-derived NO activates COX-1
pathway, and inhibitors of COX isoforms have no effect on NOS2 or NOS3 (en
dothelial NOS) pathways. These results could explain, at least in part, the
deleterious effects of NOS2 inhibitors in some experimental and clinical s
ettings, and could imply that there is a major conceptual limitation to the
use of NOS2 inhibitors during systemic inflammation.