M. Paolantonio et al., Immediate implantation in fresh extraction sockets. A controlled clinical and histological study in man, J PERIODONT, 72(11), 2001, pp. 1560-1571
Background: Early implantation may preserve the alveolar anatomy, and the p
lacement of a fixture in a fresh extraction socket helps to maintain the bo
ny crest. Although a number of clinical studies exist, no histological repo
rts show the outcome of implantation in fresh extraction sockets without th
e use of membranes in humans compared to implants placed in mature bone.
Methods: Forty-eight healthy patients, receiving at least 4 fixtures in eac
h of 2 symmetrical quadrants, underwent placement of 1 experimental fixture
placed in a fresh extraction socket (TI) and 1 contralateral fixture in ma
ture bone (Cl). TI were placed after atraumatical tooth extraction, with a
surgical site at the apex of the socket and a tight contact between the fix
ture and the socket's walls, but without the use of filling materials or me
mbranes. The flap was coronally repositioned to obtain primary wound closur
e. Immediately after surgical intervention, a standardized periapical radio
graph was taken. Second-stage surgery was done after 6 months. Six months a
fter the second surgery, a second standardized periapical radiograph was ta
ken and clinical parameters (bleeding and plaque index) recorded. Marginal
bone loss (MBL) from the time of implant placement to the time of fixture r
emoval was calculated by comparing periapical radiographs. TI and Cl were t
hen removed by a hollow drill to obtain histological specimens. Non-deminer
alized sections were stained by acid fuchsin and toluidine blue, and by von
Kossa to evaluate the degree of bone mineralization. The percentage of dir
ect implant-bone contact (DBC) was calculated by a computerized microscopic
digitizer.
Results: No significant differences in the clinical and radiographic parame
ters were observed between the 2 experimental categories. There was no stat
istically significant difference between TI and Cl for DBC either in the ma
xilla or in the mandible. No connective or fibrous tissues were present aro
und TI or Cl. Bone resorption was not present in any of the histological se
ctions.
Conclusions: The present study shows that when a screw-type dental implant
is placed without the use of barrier membranes or other regenerative materi
als into a fresh extraction socket with a bone-to-implant gap of 2 mm or le
ss, the clinical outcome and degree of osteointegration does not differ fro
m implants placed in healed, mature bone.