An investigation was carried out to compare the performance of cement
and epoxy resin grouts used for the underwater crack injection of four
damaged concrete bridge pier shafts and footings. A blended silica fu
me cement and microfine cement and a welan gum and a cellulose-based a
ntiwashout admixtures were considered in the grout optimization study.
The mixtures were tested for fluidity, viscosity, stability, penetrab
ility, rate of setting, and strength. This paper presents the results
of the laboratory evaluation and field repair, including provisions ad
opted for surface preparation, crack sealing and injection, and qualit
y control. Test results showed that the use of a microfine cement grou
t with water-to-cement ratio of 0.6 and a high-range water reducer dos
age of 2% can produce a balance between critical theological and mecha
nical properties. Such grout was found to be tolerant to changes in wa
ter-to-cement ratio, high-range water reducer content, and temperature
. The grout developed bond strength to submerged concrete similar to t
hat of a high-quality epoxy resin. Despite the lower injection pressur
e used for the less viscous cement-based grout, the grout intake was 2
.8 times greater per linear meter of surface crack than that observed
for the epoxy resin grout. The use of sonic tomography to reconstitute
the spatial distribution of stress wave velocities within the massive
pier footings indicated that the quality of concrete was significantl
y improved following injection with cement-based grout. This was attri
buted to the high penetrability of the microfine cement grout. Such qu
ality improvement was less pronounced in the case of injection groutin
g with epoxy resin.