Jt. Kuvin et al., Peripheral vascular endothelial function testing as a noninvasive indicator of coronary artery disease, J AM COL C, 38(7), 2001, pp. 1843-1849
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Objectives We studied whether assessment of endothelium-dependent vasomotio
n (ED) with brachial artery ultrasound (BAUS) imaging predicts the presence
or absence of coronary artery disease (CAD) as defined by exercise myocard
ial perfusion imaging (ExMPI).
Background Abnormalities in EDV can be detected in arteries before the deve
lopment of overt atherosclerosis, and its presence may predict poor long-te
rm prognosis. Brachial artery ultrasound during reactive hyperemia is a non
invasive method of assessing peripheral EDV.
Methods Clinically-indicated ExMPI along with BAUS were performed in 94 sub
jects (43 women, 51 men). Coronary artery disease was defined by myocardial
ischemia or infarction on single photon emission computed tomography image
s. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) after upper arm occlusion was defined as th
e percent change in arterial diameter during reactive hyperemia relative to
the baseline.
Results Subjects with CAD by ExMPI (n=23) had a lower FMD (6.3 +/-0.7%) tha
n those without CAD by ExMPI (n=71) (10.5 +/-0.6%; p=0.0004). Flow-mediated
dilation was highly predictive for CAD with an odds ratio of 1.32 for each
percent decrease in FMD (p=0.001). Based on a receiver-operator analysis,
an FMD of 10% was used as a cut-point for further analysis. Twenty-one of 2
3 subjects who were positive for ExMPI had an FMD <10% (sensitivity 91%), w
hereas only two of 40 subjects with an FMD<greater than or equal to>10% wer
e ExMPI-positive (negative predictive value: 95%). There was a correlation
between the number of cardiac risk factors and FMD. Individuals with an FMD
<10% exercised for a shorter duration than those with an FMD <greater than
or equal to>10% (456 +/- 24 vs. 544 +/- 31 s, respectively; p=0.02).
Conclusions Assessment of EDV with BAUS has a high sensitivity and an excel
lent negative predictive value for CAD and, thus, has the potential for use
as a screening tool to exclude CAD in low-risk subjects. Further standardi
zation of BAUS is required, however, before specific cut-points for excludi
ng CAD can be established. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:1843-9) (C) 2001 by t
he American College of Cardiology.