M. Thellier et al., Methodological developments for application to the study of physiological boron and to boron neutron capture therapy, J TR MICROP, 19(4), 2001, pp. 623-657
The combination of immunogold labelling with electron microscopy or the dir
ect detection of boron by electron energy loss spectrometry have the best l
ateral resolution for the imaging of boron or boron binding sites in tissue
s at the sub-cellular level. However these methods do not discriminate the
boron isotopes. A number of physical methods make it possible to combine an
alytical imaging with isotopic labelling for boron studies in biological ma
terial. Secondary ion mass spectrometry has the potential to isotopically l
ocalise virtually any element with a resolution of similar to 250 nm with c
onventional instruments and 20-50nm with prototype instruments or with the
NanoSIMS50; although SIMS has a relatively poor sensitivity for boron detec
tion in biological matrices, boron imaging in plant samples is possible. La
ser microprobe mass analysis also has the potential to detect boron isotope
s with a lateral resolution of 3 to 5 Pm and a detection limit of a few ten
s of mug/g with the conventional instruments and of the order of 1 ng/g wit
h the new LARIMP system; although mass resolution of LMMS is in general not
very good, the risk of interference by other ions at the level of boron ma
sses is limited. Neutron capture radiography is probably the easiest techni
que for boron imaging and boron isotopic labelling studies in tissues and s
ometimes at the subcellular level, although it detects only B-10 isotopes.
Nuclear reactions with charged particles (nuclear reaction analysis) have t
he potential to detect both isotopes of boron and carry out absolute boron
concentration measurements with minimal matrix effects, limited risk of int
erference by other nuclides, a lateral resolution of a few mum at the best,
a detection limit better than 1 mug/g for B-11, of the order of 10 mug/g f
or B-10 and an accuracy of 1 to 2% in the determination of B-10/B-11 isotop
ic ratios. Preventing the diffusion of possibly mobile forms of boron durin
g the preparation of the biological specimens is still a difficult problem
for most techniques. The appropriate application of those methods, or their
mutual combination or combination with other methods has made it possible:
i) to yield information about the boron concentrations and fluxes in sub-c
ellular compartments and support the view that the cellular transport of bo
ron was mainly passive under the experimental conditions under consideratio
n; ii) to image the distribution of boron and of boron binding sites in tis
sues and sometimes at the sub-cellular level; iii) to study the short-dista
nce diffusion and the long-distance transport of boron in plants and to ass
ess the role of the phloem in the long-distance transport in various plant
species; iv) to determine the origin (seed reserves vs uptake by roots) of
the boron present in different sub-cellular compartments. For boron neutron
capture therapy of cancers, invasive techniques of boron detection and ima
ging are comparable to the techniques described above for the study of phys
iological boron; for clinical applications, non-invasive techniques to foll
ow B-10-compounds in vivo are being developed, especially by targeting of s
uch compound by F-18 and the use of positron emission tomography or by dire
ct detection of B-10 by magnetic resonance imaging.